AB2366 - Administrative Procedure Act: proposed regulations: cost-of-living impact on residents of the state.

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 2366 Introduced by Assembly Member Ávila Farías February 19, 2026 An act to amend Sections 11346.3, 11346.5, 11349, 11349.1, and 11349.3 of, and to add Section 11346.37 to, the Government Code, relating to state government. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2366, as introduced, Ávila Farías. Administrative Procedure Act: proposed regulations: cost-of-living impact on residents of the state. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. The act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal any administrative regulation to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals and requires the state agency to adhere to specified requirements in making that assessment. This bill would include among those requirements for assessing the potential for adverse economic impact the consideration of the proposal’s cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, as defined. Existing law requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation that is not a major regulation to prepare an economic impact assessment that includes to what extent the regulation will affects specified factors, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state. Existing law requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis that addresses specified factors, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state. This bill would also require the assessment for nonmajor regulations to include to what extent it will affect the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, and would require the standardized regulatory impact analysis for major regulations to address the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. The bill would require an agency to notify the office when the agency determines it needs to contract for outside services to perform the analyses and would require the office to select the contractor and oversee its work. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to adopt a standardized cost-of-living methodology for use by all agencies that includes a process for determining whether those cost-of-living impacts are significant. The bill would require each state agency to submit the standardized regulatory impact analysis to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, and would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to take certain actions, including conducting an independent analysis of the adequacy of an agency’s economic analysis and an analysis of the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, and to provide its analysis to the state agency. This bill would require the Department of Finance to develop and maintain a regulatory economic burden tracker that will gather and analyze the cumulative economic burden of regulations by sector of the economy. The bill would require the department to post the tracker on its internet website and update the tracker annually. Existing law requires the notice of proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation to include, among other information, a statement of the results of the economic impact assessment and a summary of any comments submitted to the agency. This bill would instead require the notice to include a detailed statement of the results of the economic impact assessment. The bill would require the summary of comments to include the Legislative Analyst’s Office comments and agency responses, as referenced above. Existing law requires the office to review regulations and make determinations using specified standards, including, necessity, authority, and clarity. This bill would add to those standards the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. The bill would require the office, in reviewing proposed regulations for cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, to use the standardized methodology developed by the Legislative Analyst’s Office. Existing law requires the office to either approve a regulation or disapprove it within 30 working days after a regulation has been submitted to the office for review. Existing law requires the office, if it disapproves a regulation, to provide the adopting agency with a written notice detailing the reasons for disapproval. This bill would, for major regulations, increase the period of time for approval or disapproval to 60 working days. The bill would require the office, for major regulations, to hold a public hearing within 30 working days after the regulation has been submitted to the office. If one of the reasons for disapproval includes a significant cost-of-living impact, the bill would require the agency to pursue a less costly alternative or explain why a less costly alternative is infeasible. Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill Text The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 11346.3 of the Government Code is amended to read: 11346.3. (a) A state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal any administrative regulation shall assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, avoiding the imposition of unnecessary or unreasonable regulations or reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. For purposes of this subdivision, assessing the potential for adverse economic impact shall require agencies, when proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation, to adhere to the following requirements, to the extent that these requirements do not conflict with other state or federal laws: (1) The proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation shall be based on adequate information concerning the need for, and consequences of, proposed governmental action. (2) The state agency, before submitting a proposal to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation to the office, shall consider the proposal’s impact on business, with consideration of industries affected including the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states. For purposes of evaluating the impact on the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states, an agency shall consider, but not be limited to, information supplied by interested parties. (3) The state agency, before submitting a proposal to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation to the office, shall consider the proposal’s cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. (3) (4) An economic impact assessment prepared pursuant to this subdivision for a proposed regulation that is not a major regulation or that is a major regulation proposed before November 1, 2013, shall be prepared in accordance with subdivision (b), and shall be included in the initial statement of reasons as required by Section 11346.2. An economic assessment prepared pursuant to this subdivision for a major regulation proposed on or after November 1, 2013, shall be prepared in accordance with subdivision (c), and shall be included in the initial statement of reasons as required by Section 11346.2. (b) (1) A state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation that is not a major regulation or that is a major regulation proposed before November 1, 2013, shall prepare an economic impact assessment that assesses whether and to what extent it will affect the following: (A) The creation or elimination of jobs within the state. (B) The cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. (B) (C) The creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing businesses within the state. (C) (D) The expansion of businesses currently doing business within the state. (D) (E) The benefits of the regulation to the health and welfare of California residents, worker safety, and the state’s environment. (2) This subdivision does not apply to the University of California, the college named in Section 92200 of the Education Code, or the Fair Political Practices Commission. (3) Information required from a state agency for the purpose of completing the assessment may come from existing state publications. (4) (A) For purposes of conducting the economic impact assessment pursuant to this subdivision, a state agency may use the consolidated definition of small business in subparagraph (B) in order to determine the number of small businesses within the economy, a specific industry sector, or geographic region. The state agency shall clearly identify the use of the consolidated small business definition in its rulemaking package. (B) For the exclusive purpose of undertaking the economic impact assessment, a “small business” means a business that is all of the following: (i) Independently owned and operated. (ii) Not dominant in its field of operation. (iii) Has fewer than 100 employees. (C) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a regulation adopted by the Department of Insurance that applies to an insurance company. (c) (1) Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, shall prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 11346.36. The standardized regulatory impact analysis shall address all of the following: (A) The creation or elimination of jobs within the state. (B) The cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. (B) (C) The creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing businesses within the state. (C) (D) The competitive advantages or disadvantages for businesses currently doing business within the state. (D) (E) The increase or decrease of investment in the state. (E) (F) The incentives for innovation in products, materials, or processes. (F) (G) The benefits of the regulations, including, but not limited to, benefits to the health, safety, and welfare of California residents, worker safety, and the state’s environment and quality of life, among any other benefits identified by the agency. (2) This subdivision shall not apply to the University of California, the college named in Section 92200 of the Education Code, or the Fair Political Practices Commission. (3) Information required from state agencies for the purpose of completing the analysis may be derived from existing state, federal, or academic publications. (d) Any administrative regulation adopted on or after January 1, 1993, that requires a report shall not apply to businesses, unless the state agency adopting the regulation makes a finding that it is necessary for the health, safety, or welfare of the people of the state that the regulation apply to businesses. (e) Analyses conducted pursuant to this section are intended to provide agencies and the public with tools to determine whether the regulatory proposal is an efficient and effective means of implementing the policy decisions enacted in statute or by other provisions of law in the least burdensome manner. Regulatory impact analyses shall inform the agencies and the public of the economic consequences of regulatory choices, not reassess statutory policy. The baseline for the regulatory analysis shall be the most cost-effective set of regulatory measures that are equally effective in achieving the purpose of the regulation in a manner that ensures full compliance with the authorizing statute or other law being implemented or made specific by the proposed regulation. (f) When a state agency determines that it needs to contract for outside services in order to perform the analyses in this section, the agency shall notify the office and the office shall select the contractor and oversee its work. (g) The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall adopt a standardized cost-of-living methodology for use by all agencies. The methodology shall also include a process for determining whether those cost-of-living impacts are significant. (f) (h) Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, and that has prepared a standardized regulatory impact analysis pursuant to subdivision (c), shall submit that analysis to the Department of Finance upon completion. The department shall comment, within 30 days of receiving that analysis, on the extent to which the analysis adheres to the regulations adopted pursuant to Section 11346.36. Upon receiving the comments from the department, the agency may update its analysis to reflect any comments received from the department and shall summarize the comments and the response of the agency along with a statement of the results of the updated analysis for the statement required by paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5. (i) Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation and that has prepared a standardized regulatory impact analysis pursuant to subdivision (c) shall submit that analysis to the Legislative Analyst’s Office upon completion. The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall conduct an independent analysis of the adequacy of an agency’s economic analyses prepared pursuant to this section. The office shall also conduct its own analysis of the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state of a proposed regulation. If the office finds that the cost-of-living impacts of a proposed regulation are significant, the office shall identify means by which the cost of the proposed regulation could be reduced. The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall provide its analysis and comments on these items to the state agency within 60 days. Upon receiving the comments from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the agency may update its analysis to reflect any revisions or comments received and shall summarize the comments and response of the agency along with a statement of the results of the updated analysis for the statement required by paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5. SEC. 2. Section 11346.37 is added to the Government Code, immediately following Section 11346.36, to read: 11346.37. (a) The Department of Finance shall develop and maintain a regulatory economic burden tracker that will gather and analyze the cumulative economic burden of regulations by sector of the economy. The tracker shall integrate the regulatory costs across agencies that impact each sector. (b) The department shall post the tracker on its internet website, and shall update the tracker on an annual basis. SEC. 3. Section 11346.5 of the Government Code is amended to read: 11346.5. (a) The notice of proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation shall include the following: (1) A statement of the time, place, and nature of proceedings for adoption, amendment, or repeal of the regulation. (2) Reference to the authority under which the regulation is proposed and a referen [Text truncated for display. Full text available on Congress.gov.]